Balfron
Sources
RMS II (952) 1468, (2875) 1505
RMS IV (747) 1552-3
RMS VIII (2239) 1633
RMS IX (489) 1636
AS II (746) 1647
Stirling Retours (100) 1620, (123) 1627, (149) 1634, (186) 1646, (187) 1647, (237) 1665, (241) 1666, (256) 1670, (268) 1674, (304) 1686, (338) 1698, (377) 1613
GD8/43A 1513, GD8/44 1513
GD39/1/316 1671
GD39/5/140 1671
GD86/279 1586
GD220/1/D/5/7/1 1596, GD220/1/D/5/7/2 1610
GD220/1/D/5/7/9 1613
GD220/1/D/8/4/7 1633
GD220/1/E/2/3/2 1662, GD220/1/E/2/3/7 1591
GD430/87 1490, GD430/97/1 1495, GD430/98 1495, GD430/101/1 1509, GD430/107 1512, GD430/116 1543, GD430/131 1563, GD430/136 1573, GD430/147 1595
OSA Vol 17 No XXXVII pp 530-536, 1796, Mr James Jeffrey, Minister
RHP 15926 1834
RHP 1866/1
What is striking about Balfron is that we have a relatively small number of high-value units. It is almost as if the normal process of subdivision took place more slowly in this parish. Specifically we have:
Ballindalloch – at least 10m
Kilfasset 10m
Balfron 15m
Balgair 15m
Glinn 15m
I think a half-carucate was valued at 15m so Balfron was likely to have been at least 3 carucates.
The table gives us 96½m which, given attrition and missing data, suggests four carucates.
Leave a Reply